naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: R-44 issue-geek reply

Subject: Re: R-44 issue-geek reply
From: "Jez" tempjez
Date: Sat Jun 23, 2012 3:35 am ((PDT))
ta.

yes, I was aware that the R-26 had the same pre-amps as the R-44. Still testing 
to work out if they sound the same though :)

DPA adaptor - thats interesting. The ones I have just say DAD6001 on them & 
they are a couple of years old so I probably have the early ones. I'll mention 
this to DPA & see if they can make any comment on whether either the new or the 
older one would make any difference. 

ta.

--- In  "sainganrob" <> 
wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In  "Jez" <tempjez@> wrote:
> >
> > its definitely something between roland & the dpa's - its a new unit & it 
> > also does it on the R-26 (also new).
> > 
> 
> FWIW, from Roland's website .. "The R-26 inputs are equipped with 
> high-performance mic preamps directly inherited from Roland's R-44 
> professional recorder"
> 
> DAD6001-BC adapter and R-44/R-26 problem interaction?? dunno!
> 
> The newer DAD6001-BC(-Belt Clip)adapter is an active device 100R output 3.5mA 
> consumption. The older, just DAD6001, was a passive RC unit with a zener for 
> 'hot plugging' protection. If you could get hold of and try one of the 
> earlier ones (or I could pm you the schematic to make one) it may provide a 
> solution.
> 
> Rob
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU