naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: R-44 issue-geek reply

Subject: Re: R-44 issue-geek reply
From: "Jez" tempjez
Date: Sat Jun 23, 2012 4:55 am ((PDT))
oops - typo:

'interestingly the only mic i've tried so far in the R-44 that somehow (ano=
ther total mystery) seem to result in the display noise issue is the Sanken=
 CUW-180 !'

should have read 'NOT to result in the display noise issue' !

--- In  "Jez" <> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> sure: most of these steps will be obvious but just to make extra 100%
> sure:
> 1) make sure all limiters, filters etc are off on the R-262) turn on
> phantom 3) sensitivity as per factory settings (mid way)4) gain dials:
> the issue can be heard at any level but turn it up high until you hear
> the digital display sound, then dial it back - once your ears pick it up
> you can focus on it even it really low gain levels.
> I've uploaded a few short examples of these issues on both the R-26 &
> the R-44 here:
> r-26 & r-44 issues
> <http://soundcloud.com/jrf-tests/sets/roland-r-44-r-26-issues>
>
> (please note: these recordings were done by a frustrated me in a room
> covered with microphones, adaptors, cables, battery packs, manuals &
> various other arghhhh whats-going-on clutter - so don't expect them to
> be with mics measured into the right positions :)  - they were all made
> with the mics placed as far from the recorder as possible in the room
> though)
> interestingly the only mic i've tried so far in the R-44 that somehow
> (another total mystery) seem to result in the display noise issue is the
> Sanken CUW-180 !
>
>
> --- In  ac <analoghell@> wrote:
> >
> > Jez - i have a brand new SMK4060 set of 4060s and an R26 and i'm not
> > sure i'm experiencing the same thing.
> >
> > Do you have an example we can listen to?
> >
> > Can you explain the steps to reproduce?
> >
> > ac
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Jez tempjez@ wrote:
> > > ta.
> > >
> > > yes, I was aware that the R-26 had the same pre-amps as the R-44.
> Still testing to work out if they sound the same though :)
> > >
> > > DPA adaptor - thats interesting. The ones I have just say DAD6001 on
> them & they are a couple of years old so I probably have the early ones.
> I'll mention this to DPA & see if they can make any comment on whether
> either the new or the older one would make any difference.
> > >
> > > ta.
> > >
> > > --- In  "sainganrob"
> unbalancedmike@ wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --- In  "Jez" <tempjez@> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > its definitely something between roland & the dpa's - its a new
> unit & it also does it on the R-26 (also new).
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> FWIW, from Roland's website .. "The R-26 inputs are equipped with
> high-performance mic preamps directly inherited from Roland's R-44
> professional recorder"
> > >>
> > >> DAD6001-BC adapter and R-44/R-26 problem interaction?? dunno!
> > >>
> > >> The newer DAD6001-BC(-Belt Clip)adapter is an active device 100R
> output 3.5mA consumption. The older, just DAD6001, was a passive RC unit
> with a zener for 'hot plugging' protection. If you could get hold of and
> try one of the earlier ones (or I could pm you the schematic to make
> one) it may provide a solution.
> > >>
> > >> Rob
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> > > sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie
> Krause.
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU