--- Dan Dugan <> wrote:
> Jan Larsson, you wrote,
>
> >In my personal view the amplifier is more important than the actual
> >monitor. Its the amp that gives the ability to hear into the
> different
> >strands of sound. And it is the amp will (or will not) have the
> ability
> >to render details and control the monitor so it replays them. The
> >monitor itself only make the acoustic presentation and there are
> many
> >models on the market that is o.k. I always make sure I have the
> best
> >possible amp (and cables that electrically match the amp - good amp
> >manufacturers usually declare this) and make do with whatever
> monitors
> >are available.
>
> From my experience (35 years doing pro sound) you have it exactly
> backwards. The transducers (mics and speakers) make huge differences
> in the sound. Electronic components like preamps and power amps,
> assuming they aren't overloaded, are -much- less important to sound
> quality. Exotic cables are a fraud.
>
> -Dan Dugan
My 30yrs experience in pro sound and esoteric home audio agrees with
Dan's statements.
bret
=09=09
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|