birding-aus

Winton, QLD

To: Denise Goodfellow <>, Martin Butterfield <>
Subject: Winton, QLD
From: "mike.honeyman" <>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 12:59:22 +1000
And general health and safety risks and liabilities around open water, human 
health risks (wastewater), drinking water contamination risks (dams), 
unintentional interference with operations and so on and so on....
Speaking from personal experience most water utilities would be happy to take 
the 'greenie points' of having facilities as an environmental and community 
benefit, but please try and have some sympathy with the difficulties often 
presented to acheiving this which is after all a 'nice to have', not a core 
function.


Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
-------- Original message --------From: Denise Goodfellow 
<> Date: 10/8/18  12:41 pm  (GMT+10:00) To: Martin 
Butterfield <> Cc: Graeme Stevens <>, 
birding-aus <>, Michael Honeyman 
<> Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Winton, QLD 
I know.  According to a senior public servant one reason why access to 
facilities up here such as sewage ponds and Darwin River Dam is now so 
difficult  is crocodiles.  Another is a fear of terrorism.   

Denise 
On 10 Aug 2018, at 9:36 am, Martin Butterfield <> wrote:
Its not just in the US.  Some councils in NSW (I'm thinking of Lake Cargelligo 
as the best example) who promote their used-water facilities as birding sites 
and get a lot of people staying in their caravan sites and spending $$ in the 
towns.  Others Councils, including the equivalent mob responsible for the ACT, 
seem blinkered in their consideration of more than one use for these sites
Martin Butterfieldhttp://franmart.blogspot.com.au/


On 10 August 2018 at 07:28, Denise Goodfellow <> wrote:
Graeme, couldn’t agree more.  But such attitudes towards birders are not 
surprising.  A couple of decades ago I put it to councils around the NT that 
birders are a market they should target.  In North America birding has been the 
saviour of the economy of some small towns.  There is still little interest as 
I found when I put it to both the mayors of my shire and Tennant Creek.
Here, by the way, I’m not just talking listers.  Most birders have a wide range 
of interests, and many are travelling with a spouse as well.  
Denise


On 10 Aug 2018, at 6:31 am, Graeme Stevens <> wrote:
Also my line Denise:
Very polite advice on the power of this medium to spread the word and the risk 
of a "Birding and grey nomad" bypass as they give Winton a "why bother" just at 
the time when the severe drought needs visitors to support local businesses.
Perhaps they have so many visitors stocking up before chasing Night Parrots 
that the don't really care?
Graeme S


From: Denise Goodfellow <>
Sent: Friday, 10 August 2018 6:23 AM
To: Martin Butterfield
Cc: Graeme Stevens; birding-aus; Michael Honeyman
Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Winton, QLD I’m an ex-alderman (Darwin City Council) 
and know that this is the case for many issues.  Which is why I took the 
tourism angle.  
Denise

On 10 Aug 2018, at 5:28 am, Martin Butterfield <> wrote:
Welcome to the world of Local Government!  What would get the Council's
attention would be complaints from residents - preferably ones who pay a
lot of rates - of the area.  Outsiders jumping up and down can be safely
ignored.

Martin Butterfield
http://franmart.blogspot.com.au/

On 9 August 2018 at 21:52, Graeme Stevens <> wrote:

And no response to email.

Graeme Stevens


________________________________
From: Birding-Aus <> on behalf of Greg
and Val Clancy <>
Sent: Thursday, 9 August 2018 8:10 PM
To: Michael Honeyman; Peter Shute
Cc: 
Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Winton, QLD

I agree that we shouldn’t 'shoot from the hip' but I am still awaiting a
response from the Director of Works who promised to call me back days ago.
I have followed up but to no avail. Not a good look.

Greg Clancy

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Honeyman
Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 10:27 PM
To: Peter Shute
Cc: 
Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Winton, QLD

Very much depends on the site Peter!

And to an extent also depends on who you ask. I’ve worked on jobs where
previous advice given was along the lines of ‘fill it all in and build a
big
automated plant’ and been able to recommend minor changes that kept the
lagoons in situ with minor modifications.

That said vegetation to any significant degree usually risks the integrity
of the lining of the pond, and whether 500 rhizomes or 250 rhizomes are
starting to penetrate the liner is academic - they all have to come out to
protect the liner.

Another factor is that ponds (usually over many years) accumulate sludge as
part of the way they operate and this needs to be periodically dug out one
way or another. If the reeds are growing in the sludge then again, they
have
to come out.

This is all speculation on my part of course, just trying to give some
context as someone experienced in the design and operation of treatment
lagoons before the birding community shoots from the hip at too many
council
employees. In the unique situation of being both qualified as an engineer
and qualified as an ornithologist!

mjh

On 8 Aug 2018, at 20:52, Peter Shute <> wrote:

Are compromises feasible, Mike? Eg just remove half the reeds?

Peter Shute

Sent from my iPad

On 8 Aug 2018, at 6:47 am, mike.honeyman <>
wrote:

Hi allThere is mention of the 'old' treatment ponds, was this a current
active treatment plant?
Excessive vegetation in treatment lagoons is not condusive to their
primary purpose - treating sewage - so if they were active lagoons there
may have been a need to have removed the veg to ensure it was working
effectively.I'm not personally familiar with this site, but have
consulted on other sites where the lagoons had reeds encroaching and the
reeds have generally had to go, birds or not.
mjh
null
<HR>
<BR> Birding-Aus mailing list
<BR> 
<BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
<BR> https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
http%3A%2F%2Fbirding-aus.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%
2Fbirding-aus_birding-aus.org&data=02%7C01%7C%
7C49de4b9c764d48f5864108d5fde1f702%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaa
aaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636694069319730920&sdata=lCajKzOAfRnLYAMKT8eo80siRUbwGo
4nT23h4VQFIJI%3D&reserved=0
</HR>


<HR>
<BR> Birding-Aus mailing list
<BR> 
<BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
<BR> https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
http%3A%2F%2Fbirding-aus.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%
2Fbirding-aus_birding-aus.org&data=02%7C01%7C%
7C49de4b9c764d48f5864108d5fde1f702%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaa
aaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636694069319730920&sdata=lCajKzOAfRnLYAMKT8eo80siRUbwGo
4nT23h4VQFIJI%3D&reserved=0
</HR>


<HR>
<BR> Birding-Aus mailing list
<BR> 
<BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
<BR> https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
http%3A%2F%2Fbirding-aus.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%
2Fbirding-aus_birding-aus.org&data=02%7C01%7C%
7C49de4b9c764d48f5864108d5fde1f702%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaa
aaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636694069319730920&sdata=lCajKzOAfRnLYAMKT8eo80siRUbwGo
4nT23h4VQFIJI%3D&reserved=0
</HR>
<HR>
<BR> Birding-Aus mailing list
<BR> 
<BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
<BR> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
</HR>

<HR>
<BR> Birding-Aus mailing list
<BR> 
<BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
<BR> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
</HR>



<HR>
<BR> Birding-Aus mailing list
<BR> 
<BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
<BR> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
</HR>
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU