naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: mic pre with headphone out

Subject: Re: mic pre with headphone out
From: Klas Strandberg <>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 23:24:55 +0200
When using your Tascam, which microphones did you use?

I have to ask, as I find the Tascam inputs quite okay. But perhaps I have t=
o
reconsider? I only use high-output mic's like Telinga and MKH and others,
and I always get mic noise, not pre-amp noise.

I let Walt comment on the usb preamp.

Klas.

At 11:32 2002-08-08 -0500, you wrote:
>Klas--
>Good point, but I haven't been able to find an affordable recorder
>with a good, built-in pre. I used the built-in preamp in a $1500
>Tascam DAP1 for years and the MP2 has a lot less noise and I think a
>better sound.  You think the HHB pre will compare to something with
>Lunddahls? Know of a recorder with a good pre that is than a $700 DAT
>+ a $800 pre?  I use the -10dB line out into line in on my DAT.
>
>Pres may become even more important. In theory, don't you think a
>good transparent pre --> 24 bit usb--> hard drive will impress us?
>Rob
>
>
>=3D =3D =3D =3D =3D
>
>
>>Walt,
>>
>>apart from Gianni Pavan, who knows what he wants and have some special
>>wishes, I agree, - I don't really understand the demand for pre-amps. Wha=
t
>>do people hope to get? If the pre-amp is perfect, it will not change
>>anything except the gain!?
>>It was very different some 20 years ago, when you had to squeeze the best
>>out of a dynamic microphone. Or now, if you have to handle very strong so=
und
>>pressure levels.
>>
>>Yes, Rob - Sounddevices use input transformers manufactured by Lunddahl, =
a
>>father and a son living nearby my place. Best transformers in the world, =
no
>>doupt! That a small Wisconsin company find such quality pieces all the wa=
y
>>from Sweden, really shows their class and consideration! Salut!
>>(On the other hand I question the use of input transformers, but that is
>>another debate.)
>>
>>Klas.
>>
>>
>>At 23:03 2002-08-07 -0400, you wrote:
>>>Rob Danielson wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Hello!
>>>>  I use an MP-2 only almost daily with phantom power mics, the noise is
>>>>  very, very low.  Sounddevices.com is a small company here in
>>>>  Wisconsin. I'm sure they'd be happy to explain their specs and
>>>>  discuss design and performance needs. Very nice folks.
>>>>  Rob D.
>>>
>>>The usual quick and dirty test is to monitor it's output at full gain
>>>while switching the phantom power on and off. Not foolproof, but a good
>>>indicator, better if a way can be figured to apply full load to the powe=
r.
>>>
>>>Have you used it with rechargables? They seem to be giving 6 hours with
>>>alkalines and that without phantom power.
>>>
>>>I've managed without a pre so far, but since I've now got the MKH
>>>shotgun mics, I'll probably want one sooner or later. And the M/S
>>>decoder is attractive so that I could monitor in stereo. It's one I've
>>>been eyeing.
>>>
>>>Walt
>>  >
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/=

>
>
>
This outgoing e-mail is scanned for viruses with Norton 2002

Telinga Microphones, Botarbo,
S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden.
Phone & fax int + 295 310 01
email: 
       
org. no SE440130067001



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU