It is usally the case in surveys that the unhappy ones are far more likely
to email than happy ones. This is why most review sites for products etc
tend to give a bad impression -most people far more likely to write a
negative review if unhappy than bother to write a positive review if happy.
So on this basis I would expect there to be many people saying they are
unhappy with BA and only a few saying they are happy - but it seems the
other way around!
On the other hand of course there is always a resistance to change I guess!
As for it being only a few replies - seems to me that it has attracted a lot
of discussion compared to most BA topics.
The earlier suggestion on birding sites suggested that it would make more
sense if people used the various birdlines as a means for reporting rarities
and kept BA for general birding discussions, RFIs, trip reports etc. I
personally think that is a good idea but I guess it will take a long time to
change the way people think
2010/1/27 Luke Shelley <>
> <>
>
> For those of you that did not like Clair's suggestion, I wonder if you made
> that decision based on well-founded knowledge and experience of what works
> (as some of you have demonstrated in your replies), or just purely based on
> resistance to change, and what is best for you? Do you really think that a
> dozen or so replies against the suggestion is an accurate representation of
> all of the users of Birding-Aus?
>
>
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
===============================
|
