naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Impressed!

Subject: Re: Impressed!
From: "sounds.images" sounds.images
Date: Sun Feb 24, 2013 1:15 am ((PST))
I did, I care fully glossed over it!  Jez pointed out similar to me in his =
reply,  I have heard some quite noisy recordings with the 4060s and was sur=
prised considering their price point.. My eBay Lavs seem quieter!

Need to have some clam weather to truly test these Rode mics and will keep =
everyone updated with my findings.

Thanks for the replies and pointers.

Simon.


--- In  Dan Dugan <> wrote:
>
> > I would (carefully !) take issue with the comment about self noise of 1=
7db not being good enough for nature work as most of the mics that offer tr=
uly stunning recordings in the field have self noise of around this or even=
 higher (such as the DPA4060's).
>
> In terms of fidelity I agree with you completely. It all depends on the s=
cene. In quiet forest or desert soundscapes 17dBA mic self-noise will be th=
e noise floor of the recording. In these cases quieter mics will be better.
>
> -Dan
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU