naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Impressed!

Subject: Re: Impressed!
From: "jtudor2005" jtudor2005
Date: Fri Feb 22, 2013 4:48 pm ((PST))
Whilst Rode mics are very good, the NT3 is aimed more at vocal work. The go=
ld dot on the body is really irrelevant as it's an end address cardioid mic=
, so it doesn't matter from which side you aim it. It's the end that gets a=
imed. The equivalent noise of around 17dBA also makes it a tad noisy for na=
ture work



--- In  "sounds.images" <=
> wrote:
>
> Not only have I been impressed with this group and the skills and helpful=
ness of those here, but I have been impressed again..
>
> I have not had as much spare cash recently as I would like, too many micr=
ophone wants are having to wait. But I recently did a music gig in a school=
 and have in coveted in a couple of mics. Now these would probably get over=
 looked due to the price but are so far amazing. I bought a pair of Rode M3=
s and finally a support for this job I went for  a photographic light stand=
 as this seemed a perfect combination of compactness and height.. So I got =
a Manfrotto 5001B Nano stand. Not sure how many here use this but if you do=
n't take a look...
>
> Soundsandimages.wordpress.com
>
> I also found an eBay seller offering fluffies for it, should be fine in c=
almer conditions but it has been very windy here for the last couple of day=
s and very cold with it.
>
> I have been recording in the woods but only have one file online at the b=
ottom of my blog.
>
> Regards.
>
> Simon.
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU