naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Impressed!

Subject: Re: Impressed!
From: "Jez" tempjez
Date: Sat Feb 23, 2013 8:11 am ((PST))
Hi Simon,

its one of the best things about the field recording community - tons of fo=
lks willing to share advice & tips etc.

1) watch out for those fluffy's on ebay - they aren't made with acousticall=
y transparent material & are, in most cases, no better than fake fur diy jo=
bs. They'll muffle the sound coming into the mic.

2) if you're on a budget then fluffy's aren't needed in even fairly strong =
winds - what's important is the space created by cage's around the mic & co=
vered with acoustically transparent material (high wind cover as rycote cal=
l it for example).

3) Rode: for their price Rode have some decent mics, mostly reverse-enginee=
red from other makes, but as someone else has pointed out they mostly aren'=
t made for location work so have some restrictions. However I would (carefu=
lly !) take issue with the comment about self noise of 17db not being good =
enough for nature work as most of the mics that offer truly stunning record=
ings in the field have self noise of around this or even higher (such as th=
e DPA4060's).

4) again, if budget is tight then I'm sure i'm not alone in suggesting that=
 you take a look at a pair of omni mics to expand your kit. Depending on yo=
ur budget & the recorder you have then you can go from the entry level ones=
 made by MM audio (bsm9's), Naiant (x-x) to the Rode Lavalier & then the be=
st: DPA4060's or Sanken COS.

thats my 2 pence worth :)

oh & yes, lighting stands are often much, much lighter than mic stands or t=
ripods + cheap enough to not worry about if they get knocked.

--- In  "sounds.images" <=
> wrote:
>
> Not only have I been impressed with this group and the skills and helpful=
ness of those here, but I have been impressed again..
>
> I have not had as much spare cash recently as I would like, too many micr=
ophone wants are having to wait. But I recently did a music gig in a school=
 and have in coveted in a couple of mics. Now these would probably get over=
 looked due to the price but are so far amazing. I bought a pair of Rode M3=
s and finally a support for this job I went for  a photographic light stand=
 as this seemed a perfect combination of compactness and height.. So I got =
a Manfrotto 5001B Nano stand. Not sure how many here use this but if you do=
n't take a look...
>
> Soundsandimages.wordpress.com
>
> I also found an eBay seller offering fluffies for it, should be fine in c=
almer conditions but it has been very windy here for the last couple of day=
s and very cold with it.
>
> I have been recording in the woods but only have one file online at the b=
ottom of my blog.
>
> Regards.
>
> Simon.
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU