Hi Jon,
Not tried the NT3 but I wondered how it might fair in the field. I am impre=
ssed by the M3 which is so far very good, though with the wind not done ma=
ny tests as yet. I noted the points you make in my blog too. Not sure why R=
ode need to put one one these..
--- In "jtudor2005" <> wrote:
>
> Whilst Rode mics are very good, the NT3 is aimed more at vocal work. The =
gold dot on the body is really irrelevant as it's an end address cardioid m=
ic, so it doesn't matter from which side you aim it. It's the end that gets=
aimed. The equivalent noise of around 17dBA also makes it a tad noisy for =
nature work
>
>
>
> --- In "sounds.images" <sounds.images@>=
wrote:
> >
> > Not only have I been impressed with this group and the skills and helpf=
ulness of those here, but I have been impressed again..
> >
> > I have not had as much spare cash recently as I would like, too many mi=
crophone wants are having to wait. But I recently did a music gig in a scho=
ol and have in coveted in a couple of mics. Now these would probably get ov=
er looked due to the price but are so far amazing. I bought a pair of Rode =
M3s and finally a support for this job I went for a photographic light sta=
nd as this seemed a perfect combination of compactness and height.. So I go=
t a Manfrotto 5001B Nano stand. Not sure how many here use this but if you =
don't take a look...
> >
> > Soundsandimages.wordpress.com
> >
> > I also found an eBay seller offering fluffies for it, should be fine in=
calmer conditions but it has been very windy here for the last couple of d=
ays and very cold with it.
> >
> > I have been recording in the woods but only have one file online at the=
bottom of my blog.
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> > Simon.
> >
>
|