naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Impressed!

Subject: Re: Impressed!
From: "Jez" tempjez
Date: Sun Feb 24, 2013 10:02 am ((PST))
btw. might be helpful (I know its a can of worms !) to list a few mics, of =
something approaching equal sound quality of the DPA's, that are quieter in=
 terms of self noise than 17db.

my own favourite mic right now is the Sanken CUW-180 but that is also 17db,=
 though i've not found the self noise to be an issue even recording empty (=
very, very quiet) buildings for example.


--- In  Dan Dugan <> wrote:
>
> > I would (carefully !) take issue with the comment about self noise of 1=
7db not being good enough for nature work as most of the mics that offer tr=
uly stunning recordings in the field have self noise of around this or even=
 higher (such as the DPA4060's).
>
> In terms of fidelity I agree with you completely. It all depends on the s=
cene. In quiet forest or desert soundscapes 17dBA mic self-noise will be th=
e noise floor of the recording. In these cases quieter mics will be better.
>
> -Dan
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU