Whilst the DPA has 2dB more self noise, the sensitivity is just over three
times that of the Rode M3. (20mV/Pa v 6.3mV/Pa) So in order to get the same
input level, the DPA can be run at a lower gain setting. Hence the 'quieter'
sounding recording.
So it needs to be compared in context.
--- In "sounds.images" <>
wrote:
>
>
> I did, I care fully glossed over it! Jez pointed out similar to me in his
> reply, I have heard some quite noisy recordings with the 4060s and was
> surprised considering their price point.. My eBay Lavs seem quieter!
>
> Need to have some clam weather to truly test these Rode mics and will keep
> everyone updated with my findings.
>
> Thanks for the replies and pointers.
>
> Simon.
>
>
> --- In Dan Dugan <dan@> wrote:
> >
> > > I would (carefully !) take issue with the comment about self noise of
> > > 17db not being good enough for nature work as most of the mics that offer
> > > truly stunning recordings in the field have self noise of around this or
> > > even higher (such as the DPA4060's).
> >
> > In terms of fidelity I agree with you completely. It all depends on the
> > scene. In quiet forest or desert soundscapes 17dBA mic self-noise will be
> > the noise floor of the recording. In these cases quieter mics will be
> > better.
> >
> > -Dan
> >
>
|