vicki, thank you. I know you use an LS10.
I didn't realize the LS11 and LS10 were replaced by the LS10s.
and the LS20 and LS100.
The latter two would work with the AT3032, but I like the simplicity of the=
LS10/11. and I'm considering a mic upgrade with mini plug for "binaural" w=
ork.
The only review I could find on the LS10s said "Good product but that dread=
ed click (though pretty soft and editable off-line) when pausing!"
Do you know about anything about the LS10s.
And does a click always occur when on pause.
lily
On Dec 30, 2012, at 2:18 PM, vickipowys <> wrote:
> Lily,
>
> LS10 and LS11 are pretty much the same, LS11 has longer battery life
> but LS10 is already excellent, 12 hours for a pair of AAs. Both
> rugged and easy to use. Either should work a treat with some
> binaural mics. I don't think there is any difference with pre-amp
> noise between LS10 & 11. You get the best result noise-wise when
> using low sensitivity and maximum volume (10), rather than high
> sensitivity and (say) volume 4.
>
> Vicki
>
> On 31/12/2012, at 7:41 AM, lilyplants wrote:
>
> > hello,
> >
> > According to my memory someone has a list of recorders which
> > compares their preamp noise. I'd like information re the
> > differences among the various Olympus recorders.
> >
> > Unfortunately I purchased a recorder I don't like, the Edirol
> > R-09HR. I wouldn't like it if it were quiet -- too hard to see and
> > use. I so like the build of LS 10, but had some problem don't
> > remember. Really enjoyed using a friend's LS 11.
> >
> > I have two quiet mics AT3032 for a Fostex FR-2LE and a pair of
> > sound professionals "binaurals".
> >
> > thank you.
> > lily
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> > sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie
> > Krause.
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>
|