naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Olympus recorder comparisons

Subject: Re: Olympus recorder comparisons
From: "lilyplants" lilyplants
Date: Tue Jan 1, 2013 12:32 pm ((PST))
Thanks to all.

>From what I understand (John Crocket's comment and Robin's list here), the =
LS-5, altho the same electronically would offer more gain in low frequencie=
s than the LS-10S. more card memory, file management on board as well as on=
 the computer via its software.

I like the dynamic range of these recorders. low frequencies are important =
to in creating large soundstage.

I found the LS-5 on Amazon UK. it would be about $235 dollars (don't know a=
bout shipping). I've never bought anything from Europe. Anything I should k=
now before ordering on line?

Altho I've ordered the LS-10S, I can return it.

Happy new year to all. And thank you for going thru this with me.

lily

--- In  "Robin" <> wrote:
>
> For the record, the Olympus LS-10 / 10S / 11 / 5 recorders are fundamenta=
lly the same, with identical form factors, controls, and electronics. Here =
are the differences:
>
> internal memory in GB: 2 / 2 / 8 / 2
> battery life in hours: 12 / 12 / 23 / 23
> maximum size of SDHC in GB: 8 / 8 / 32 / 32
> mono recording available: no / no / yes / yes
> files can be indexed, cut, moved: no / no / yes / yes
> automatic recording triggered by input level: no / no / yes / yes
> enforced LF cut*: yes / yes / no / no
> acts as A/D computer interface: no / no / no / yes
> colour: black / black / silver / blue
> included software: Cubase LE4 / none / Cubase LE4 / Sonority
> soft case included: yes / no / yes / no
> remote control included: no / no / yes / no
>
> * This is in addition to the switchable LF. I note that it's never been a=
 problem for me, since in practice I would always be rolling off LF anyway.
>
> The Olympus LS-3 / 7 are based on different circuits, with noisier pre-am=
ps (4dB A-weighted according to Raimund). Being smaller, they lack a line i=
n. They do have a pre-record buffer and some other new features. Not to men=
tion a third centre microphone.
>
> It appears the Olympus LS-12 and 14 are based on the LS-3 template.
>
> IMO the Olympus LS-5 is the best value hand-held digital recorder on the =
market: all the important features and no-compromise sound quality at less =
than =A3150 / =80150. It would be perfect if only they would add a pre-reco=
rd buffer and the dual-recording safety mode of devices like the Tascam DR-=
Message: 40.

Subject: >
> -- Robin Parmar
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU