l
Date: Tue Jan 1, 2013 1:25 pm ((PST))
I don't know if anyone else has stated this since this post, but one of the=
big differences between the LS-10 and the LS-11 is the lower frequencies t=
he LS-11 can capture compared to the LS-10. The LS-10 will go down to 120hz=
, while the LS-11 can capture down to 60hz. You wont see this in any of the=
USA Olympus sites and or documents, but this has been stated in the Olympu=
s Asia and Europe sites on different forums in the past.
--- In vickipowys <> wrote:
>
> Lily,
>
> LS10 and LS11 are pretty much the same, LS11 has longer battery life
> but LS10 is already excellent, 12 hours for a pair of AAs. Both
> rugged and easy to use. Either should work a treat with some
> binaural mics. I don't think there is any difference with pre-amp
> noise between LS10 & 11. You get the best result noise-wise when
> using low sensitivity and maximum volume (10), rather than high
> sensitivity and (say) volume 4.
>
> Vicki
>
>
> On 31/12/2012, at 7:41 AM, lilyplants wrote:
>
> > hello,
> >
> > According to my memory someone has a list of recorders which
> > compares their preamp noise. I'd like information re the
> > differences among the various Olympus recorders.
> >
> > Unfortunately I purchased a recorder I don't like, the Edirol
> > R-09HR. I wouldn't like it if it were quiet -- too hard to see and
> > use. I so like the build of LS 10, but had some problem don't
> > remember. Really enjoyed using a friend's LS 11.
> >
> > I have two quiet mics AT3032 for a Fostex FR-2LE and a pair of
> > sound professionals "binaurals".
> >
> > thank you.
> > lily
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> > sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie
> > Krause.
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
|