Hi Lily,
Like Vicky, I have never experienced any clicks with my LS-10 either. And a=
lso like Vicky, I think it's something that in our line of recording is com=
pletely irrelevant. My advice would be, if you can pick up an LS-1O cheaply=
do so; I don't think you'd regret it. It's superbly built, and is apparent=
ly more user friendly than the latest 100. From what I've read, that's a ni=
ghtmare.
Cheers
Max
--- In vickipowys <> wrote:
>
> Lily,
>
> To add to the confusion there is also an LS5, I have not tried
> anything other than LS10, but a friend who had owned LS10 upgraded to =
> LS11 and found almost no difference.
>
> I believe you can still buy LS10 which was re-released, hopefully
> quite cheap to buy.
>
> I have never experienced noticable clicks with pausing on the LS10,
> not that I use pause a lot. I frankly think that is a non-issue for
> wildlife sound recording.
>
> Vicki
>
>
> On 31/12/2012, at 10:20 AM, sandy hall-behrens wrote:
>
> > vicki, thank you. I know you use an LS10.
> >
> > I didn't realize the LS11 and LS10 were replaced by the LS10s.
> > and the LS20 and LS100.
> >
> > The latter two would work with the AT3032, but I like the
> > simplicity of the LS10/11. and I'm considering a mic upgrade with
> > mini plug for "binaural" work.
> >
> > The only review I could find on the LS10s said "Good product but
> > that dreaded click (though pretty soft and editable off-line) when
> > pausing!"
> >
> > Do you know about anything about the LS10s.
> > And does a click always occur when on pause.
> >
> > lily
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Dec 30, 2012, at 2:18 PM, vickipowys <>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Lily,
> >>
> >> LS10 and LS11 are pretty much the same, LS11 has longer battery life
> >> but LS10 is already excellent, 12 hours for a pair of AAs. Both
> >> rugged and easy to use. Either should work a treat with some
> >> binaural mics. I don't think there is any difference with pre-amp
> >> noise between LS10 & 11. You get the best result noise-wise when
> >> using low sensitivity and maximum volume (10), rather than high
> >> sensitivity and (say) volume 4.
> >>
> >> Vicki
> >>
> >> On 31/12/2012, at 7:41 AM, lilyplants wrote:
> >>
> >>> hello,
> >>>
> >>> According to my memory someone has a list of recorders which
> >>> compares their preamp noise. I'd like information re the
> >>> differences among the various Olympus recorders.
> >>>
> >>> Unfortunately I purchased a recorder I don't like, the Edirol
> >>> R-09HR. I wouldn't like it if it were quiet -- too hard to see and
> >>> use. I so like the build of LS 10, but had some problem don't
> >>> remember. Really enjoyed using a friend's LS 11.
> >>>
> >>> I have two quiet mics AT3032 for a Fostex FR-2LE and a pair of
> >>> sound professionals "binaurals".
> >>>
> >>> thank you.
> >>> lily
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> >>> sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie
> >>> Krause.
> >>>
> >>> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> > sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie
> > Krause.
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
<*> Your email settings:
Digest Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|