Subject: | Re: Olympus recorder comparisons |
---|---|
From: | "lilyplants" lilyplants |
Date: | Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:36 am ((PST)) |
Oryoki, thank you for the list link. would you explain why the LS 10 and 11 are listed as quieter when on high s= ensitivity? that's the opposite of what vicki suggested. fyi: I don't understand the dynamic range numbers. only understand that -12= 1 dBu is more quiet than -113 dBu thank you. lily --- In "oryoki2000" <> wrote: > > "Someone has a list..." > > http://www.avisoft.com/recordertests.htm > > Olympus USA and Olympus Europe offer different models. You can't assume = that a model with a numerically higher name offers improved performance. O= lympus USA seems to be focused on buyers interested in less expensive model= s with noisier preamps. > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Olympus recorder comparisons, sandy hall-behrens |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Olympus recorder comparisons, John Crockett |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Olympus recorder comparisons, sandy hall-behrens |
Next by Thread: | Re: Olympus recorder comparisons, John Crockett |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU