[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Cage 100

Subject: Re: Cage 100
From: "Mark" seoulgypsy
Date: Thu Sep 6, 2012 6:01 pm ((PDT))
The beauty of words in the case, for me is not analytical, but the feeling =
it conveys as a whole. Cage is still alive and not subject to paralysis any=
time soon. For me he speaks about the sky instead of clouds. Anytime someon=
e does that, especially in these violent black and white times, going to fi=
nd resistance precisely because he is not telling you what to think, but ch=
allenging you to do so.


On Sep 7, 2012, at 7:31 AM, Peter Shute <> wrote:

> It's probably the intellectual language that sets people off. If you don'=
t understand it (I don't), it's tempting to trash the whole lot. It's only =
the fact that some other people seem to that stops me doing that.
> Peter Shute
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: 
> > On Behalf Of Klas Strandberg
> >Sent: Friday, 7 September 2012 9:51 AM
> >To: 
> >Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] RE: Cage 100
> >
> >
> >
> >Bernie,
> >there is a substance in this philosophical discussion, but I feel
> >that the beauty of the intellectual language hides the beauty of the
> >message itself... hmmm. (Cage would have liked that..)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU