| Subject: | Re: 16 bit vs 24 bit Information Theory Hypothesis |
|---|---|
| From: | "Walter Knapp" waltknapp |
| Date: | Sat May 26, 2007 8:30 pm ((PDT)) |
Posted by: "Martyn Stewart" > I thought you said you were "slapping your hands" to not get back into this > debate, Lou!!!! > > OH-MY-GOD the temptation is killing!!!!!! Like most of these it's a tar baby. I keep saying that's it! Then someone else misrepresents what I'm thinking or saying, or makes errors. I've got to where I ignore most of that, but not all. I'll try to do better. Keep asking myself if it's worth the grief to post. That stops most of my posts now. Walt |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Because She Asked..., Martyn Stewart |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 16 bit vs 24 bit Information Theory Hypothesis, Scott Fraser |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 16 bit vs 24 bit Information Theory Hypothesis, Martyn Stewart |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 16 bit vs 24 bit Information Theory Hypothesis, Scott Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU