| Subject: | Re: 16 bit vs 24 bit Information Theory Hypothesis |
|---|---|
| From: | "Lou Judson" inaudio |
| Date: | Sun May 27, 2007 7:21 am ((PDT)) |
This point is not mis. Others are... But I'm trying to back out of this discussion as I do more music than nature recording. <L> On May 27, 2007, at 1:39 AM, Raimund Specht wrote: > If one does not understand these things, even the 24 bit recording > format cannot compensate the mistakes made by the subject behind the > recorder... > > Lou, I'm sorry for continuing to post this kind of > "misinformation" ;-) |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Ithaca, New York, Mark R. |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 16 bit vs 24 bit Information Theory Hypothesis, Walter Knapp |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 16 bit vs 24 bit Information Theory Hypothesis, Raimund Specht |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 16 bit vs 24 bit Information Theory Hypothesis, Walter Knapp |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU