Subject: | Re: 16 bit vs 24 bit Information Theory Hypothesis |
---|---|
From: | "Martyn Stewart" mijdog2000 |
Date: | Sat May 26, 2007 10:23 pm ((PDT)) |
>>>Like most of these it's a tar baby. I keep saying that's it! Then someone else misrepresents what I'm thinking or saying, or makes errors. I've got to where I ignore most of that, but not all. I'll try to do better. Keep asking myself if it's worth the grief to post. That stops most of my posts now. Walt< Thing is Walt, (in my opinion) you are a valuable contributor to this list, you ARE one of the very few people I do not delete. Sometimes you get crotchety (I can understand that with some of the posts) but you talk a whole load of sense. Hope your health is improving and that wife of yours is good J Martyn **************************************** Martyn Stewart Bird and Animal Sounds Digitally Recorded at: http://www.naturesound.org Redmond. Washington. USA N47.65543 W121.98428 e-mail: Tel: 425-898-0462 Make every Garden a wildlife Habitat! ***************************************** |
Previous by Date: | Re: 16 bit vs 24 bit Information Theory Hypothesis, Scott Fraser |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: 16 bit vs 24 bit Information Theory Hypothesis, Mark R. |
Previous by Thread: | Re: 16 bit vs 24 bit Information Theory Hypothesis, Scott Fraser |
Next by Thread: | Re: 16 bit vs 24 bit Information Theory Hypothesis, Mark R. |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU