| Subject: | Re: 16 bit vs 24 bit Information Theory Hypothesis |
|---|---|
| From: | "Mark R." seoulgypsy |
| Date: | Sat May 26, 2007 11:01 pm ((PDT)) |
> Thing is Walt, (in my opinion) you are a valuable contributor to this list, > you ARE one of the very few people I do not delete. Sometimes you get > crotchety (I can understand that with some of the posts) but you talk a whole > load of sense. Hope your health is improving and that wife of yours is good J > > Martyn I am glad you said this Martyn. It's something I have wanted to say too. Mark R. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: 16 bit vs 24 bit Information Theory Hypothesis, Martyn Stewart |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 16 bit vs 24 bit Information Theory Hypothesis, umashankar |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 16 bit vs 24 bit Information Theory Hypothesis, Martyn Stewart |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 16 bit vs 24 bit Information Theory Hypothesis, umashankar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU