Subject: | Re: 16 bit vs 24 bit Information Theory Hypothesis |
---|---|
From: | "John Hartog" hartogj |
Date: | Sat May 26, 2007 11:35 am ((PDT)) |
I though the thread started in reference to a FR2LE. Maybe it would be best to stop trying to generalize, and just stick to specific recorders. I think there would not be anything advantage recording in 24bit on a Microtrax unless you want to hear the preamp noise more clearly. But what about the FR2LE that so many have recently purchased? -John Hartog --- In Tim Nielsen <> wrote: Just remember this, the original post that > started this off was about recording in 16bit versus 24bit on a Sound = > Devices recorder. In other words, on a recorder that has a CHOICE > between the two. I've never proposed that people junk their old gear > and spend a lot of money on a 24 bit recorder. The proposition has > ALWAYS been, if you have a recorder that has the option between them, = > you might want to consider recording in 24 bits for these reasons... > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 5. Re: 16 Bit & 24 Bit recordings, Martyn Stewart |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: 16 bit vs 24 bit Information Theory Hypothesis, Dan Dugan |
Previous by Thread: | Re: 16 bit vs 24 bit Information Theory Hypothesis, Tim Nielsen |
Next by Thread: | Re: 16 bit vs 24 bit Information Theory Hypothesis, Dan Dugan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU