| Subject: | Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722 ... (?) |
|---|---|
| From: | "Lou Judson" inaudio |
| Date: | Mon Sep 18, 2006 7:48 am (PDT) |
I have an OWC portable FW drive I use for music gigs - three years going now on the hitachi 80 G drive inside. I'm noticing more noise as it writes lately so a change is planned. But so far (knock wood) no failures with 16 and 18 track work routinely. I usually backup sessions to the Powerbook's internal drive until I get it home and transfered... Barracuda 100G in the future for this case. <L> Lou Judson =95 Intuitive Audio 415-883-2689 On Sep 18, 2006, at 6:46 AM, Walter Knapp wrote: > Note that the cheap firewire drives are probably less trustworthy in > the > field than the one in the 722. How many are replacing the internal > drive > on their portable firewire drive periodically? |
| Previous by Date: | Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722 ... (?), Tim Nielsen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722 ... (?), david briggs |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722 ... (?), Tim Nielsen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722 ... (?), david briggs |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU