| Subject: | Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722 ... (?) |
|---|---|
| From: | "Bruce Wilson" bruceumba |
| Date: | Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:49 am (PDT) |
Tim, You're right. http://www.sounddevices.com/tech/7-2.0-faq.htm I saw the previous entry about the DVD and then read the section about bus= power too fast, I guess. Bruce Wilson KF7K http://science.uvsc.edu/wilson |
| Previous by Date: | Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722 ... (?), david briggs |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722 ... (?), Tim Nielsen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722 ... (?), david briggs |
| Next by Thread: | Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722 ... (?), Tim Nielsen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU