naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722 ... (?)

Subject: Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722 ... (?)
From: "ortfmic" ortfmic
Date: Sun Sep 17, 2006 1:49 pm (PDT)
The 702 is a perfect fit for me. Last year, when I was researching an
upgrade from my consumer-grade field recorder, Dan Dugan suggested the
722 (the 702 and 702T were not available then). I had to delay my
purchase because of house-repair expenses, but when I was ready to
buy, the 702 was introduced. The configuration is perfect for the
"enthusiast."

Tom







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU