| Subject: | Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722 ... (?) |
|---|---|
| From: | "ortfmic" ortfmic |
| Date: | Sun Sep 17, 2006 1:49 pm (PDT) |
The 702 is a perfect fit for me. Last year, when I was researching an upgrade from my consumer-grade field recorder, Dan Dugan suggested the 722 (the 702 and 702T were not available then). I had to delay my purchase because of house-repair expenses, but when I was ready to buy, the 702 was introduced. The configuration is perfect for the "enthusiast." Tom |
| Previous by Date: | Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722 ... (?), pollyserial |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Utah Soundscapes, Wild Sanctuary |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722 ... (?), pollyserial |
| Next by Thread: | Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722 ... (?), Walter Knapp |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU