| Subject: | Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722 ... (?) |
|---|---|
| From: | "grant finlay" grantfinlay |
| Date: | Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:55 pm (PDT) |
Last year I worked on a low budget film following a steadycam , It required me to run in some scenes for about 500 metres at top speed several times and to hide from the camera doing 360 deg. moves , you get the picture... Physically it was the most demanding job I've ever done. While all this was going on I was recording four tracks on the SD 744t , it never missed a beat. Trust me, if it can record under these conditions you are pretty safe with the odd bump in the field. Did I mention that they were 10-15 minute takes with NO cuts?..... I'm glad I'm back to arts show interviews! Grant. http://www.ourmedia.org/user/44279 http://rocketrentals.com/grantf.html > >> I am curious. Do many people actually record while they are moving ? >> >> dave >> > > > |
| Previous by Date: | Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722 ... (?), Anton Woldhek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Utah Soundscapes, Walter Knapp |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722 ... (?), Anton Woldhek |
| Next by Thread: | Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722 ... (?), Dan Dugan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU