| Subject: | Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722 ... (?) |
|---|---|
| From: | "david briggs" daavebriggs |
| Date: | Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:05 am (PDT) |
I think with most non-pro users relying on a hard drive wouldnt be much different than using a laptop. But yes backups are best made of anything important. Just seems a bit wierd that you bring out an hd recorder with the capability to record for X hours and then every one is unsure about replying on the thing. As if it is going to break all the time.... dave |
| Previous by Date: | Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722 ... (?), Tim Nielsen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722 ... (?), Bruce Wilson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722 ... (?), Tim Nielsen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: V2.0 good reason for a 702 instead of 722 ... (?), Bruce Wilson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU