naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: mic check

Subject: Re: Re: mic check
From: Lou Judson <>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 09:46:13 -0700
Hmm, thanks for the mention - I have one of the sets of three CM-300s
in storage - stopped using them due to lack of phantom power - but for
field recording they would be perfect!

Few factoids: The 9V round mercury batteries are no longer available,
but the 22.5V "transistor" batteries are, and the higher voltage gives
slightly better noise performance. I recall doing some by-ear
comparisions, and except for a higher nnoise floor the CM-300s compared
nicely with AKG 451s. I'll have to dig them out and see how they fare
today. Mine have omni and cardioid capsules, too.

Thanks for the inadvertent suggestion - and I can feel less worried
using them near a stream!

;-)

Lou
On Aug 30, 2005, at 9:11 AM, umashankar wrote:

> (i have also dropped a nakamichi cm 300
> into the river once, and it recovered after a few
> hours, but i could not use it while wet.)



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU