naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: mic check

Subject: Re: Re: mic check
From: "Mark R." <>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 22:37:57 +0900
Thanks Klas,
  >The mic's are made for indoor studio work and cannot!! be reliable
>under cold / humid circumstances. (I still wanted to try them, though, as=

>they are new and untested)
   The potential of quality recording with one of these budget mics, albeit=

with the weather conditions being ideal, is consoling to me.
   > There is so much
>lying about this and all manufacturers have to follow.
  Hmmm... No standards...are the manufacturers spec guidelines ambiguous? D=
o
we need call the mic police on these guys? ;^)
  I once heard a definition of marketing, that it gives us what we want to=

hear and leaves out the rest.
   Best,
 Mark R.
=20=20
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU