Subject: | Re: mic check |
---|---|
From: | Dan Dugan <> |
Date: | Mon, 29 Aug 2005 10:31:25 -0700 |
Mark Griswold, you wrote, >I've considered Klas' EM23, but that has unbalanced output, and I'm >thinking that I would probably have a long cable run. FWIW, I've been experimenting with 50-foot cables on unbalanced 183s, and I've gotten away with it--no radio interference. I even recorded three evenings in the heart of the city with long cables and had no problem. Another concern is high-frequency rolloff from the combination of higher source impedance (2K?) and long cables. -Dan Dugan ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: mic check, Lou Judson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: draft procedure for amateur recording in parks, v. 2, Dan Dugan |
Previous by Thread: | Re: mic check, Lou Judson |
Next by Thread: | Re: mic check, Rich Peet |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU