Subject: | Re: Re: mic check |
---|---|
From: | Dan Dugan <> |
Date: | Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:59:40 -0700 |
Klas, you wrote, >The Shure mic can be good, (same category as EM23) >or a disaster. It's impossible to tell before you have tried it. What situations have been disasters? I've certainly run into its limitations, places so quiet that the mic's self-noise is too prominent, but all products have limitations. I intend to buy the quietest mics I can find, eventually, since I like to record quiet places. >How is the Shure mic powered?? It only says that it is going to be >connected to a "wireless". Does that mean any "wireless" or does it mean a >"wireless" which provides some voltage, to drive a Shure mic. I am not >familiar with such matters. It's PIP like any other electret. -Dan Dugan ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Rolls pb224, John Hartog |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: draft procedure for amateur recording in parks, v. 2, Dan Dugan |
Previous by Thread: | Re: mic check, Dan Dugan |
Next by Thread: | Re: Re: mic check, umashankar |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU