naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Adobe Flash issues with Mac OSX 10.4

Subject: Re: Adobe Flash issues with Mac OSX 10.4
From: "John Crockett" naturalcontemplative
Date: Mon Jun 18, 2012 8:28 am ((PDT))
Hi Vicki

fyi, I am using Firefox 3.6.28 with OS X 10.4.11 and soundcloud works fine,=
 no warning messages. I don't have anything set in Soundcloud. It just work=
s whether I am signed in or not. My Flash version is 10.0.22. I am resistin=
g updating it as long as it works.

Whether you want updates in Firefox to install automatically or not can be =
set in the preferences of Firefox 3.6.28, at least the original release. I =
have it set to not update automatically.

I don't want to play the "upgrade or die" game. My PowerPC Powerbook runnin=
g 10.4 is a fine computer, and I do not have the funds to upgrade.

John

John Crockett
Westminster, Vermont

--- In  vickipowys <> wrote:
>
> Hi Michael and others,
>
> >>
> >> This is slightly off-topic but in order to listen to wildlife sound
> >> tracks on Soundcloud I need to have a flash player.
> >>
> >>
> > Is this true? I was under the impression that the soundcloud player
> > switched to html5 some time ago.
>
> In 2 different browsers in soundcloud I got the message
>   "Hey, it seems your browser can't play SoundCloud audio streams, if =

> you can, please take a moment to upgrade your browser or Flash Player =

> plugin.  Thanks for your understanding!
>
> So, hey, I upgraded the browsers and the Flash Player (followed their =

> link) but got nowhere, just kept getting that 'hey' message.  Until I =

> found the Camino browser which seemed to have no trouble finding the
> Flash Player which is already in the Internet Plugins folder.
>
> John Tudor & John Campbell (thanks guys) suggested using an older
> version of Firefox, I tried this but Firefox has a new trick in that
> when you install an older version it automatically updates it again
> to the latest (and incompatible) version.  I used to have a choice
> about this upgrade but now it just happens all by itself.  Scarey!
>
> > The most current version of the Mac OS is 10.7.4 - I have never
> > found a problem in upgrading Mac's and it really doesn't take very
> > much time as it's basically automatic. You are correct in your
> > observation that that if you don't keep your operating software up-
> > to-date then things can get sticky. But with that said being to
> > fast to upgrade your Mac OS can result in the reverse problem in
> > which the off-brand software does not recognize the newer OS - so
> > its a balancing game - my solution is to keep one computer running
> > on the latest - but one OS, and my main one using the latest.
> >
> > Probably does not help much but it's what's worked for me.
> >
> > Aloha from Kona
> > Reg.
>
> > 10.4 is no longer supported by Apple for virus or malware
> > protection updates.  10.4 will not protect your computer from the
> > most recent virus.  The oldest version they are still supporting
> > with security updates is 10.6.  When 10.8 comes out this summer
> > 10.6 will no longer be supported as Apple only goes back one OS.  =

> > Best to upgrade as soon as you finish your project so you system is =

> > secure.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Jason
>
>
>
> Thanks Reg & Jason, if 10.8 is in the wings then I really am behind
> the times.  I am a novice at upgrading, I'm thinking I need to go to
> a Mac store and buy a real CD to do the upgrade?  I did a minor
> upgrade once, but did that via the software downloads facility.
> Maybe I will get the Mac people to do the upgrade for me, when the
> time comes.
>
> Meanwhile I will use Camino to access SoundCloud, and see how long I
> can last out without upgrading my OS.  I agree with your comments
> John Campbell :-) and pleased to hear that I'm not the only person in =

> the world still using 10.4.
>
> Vicki Powys
> Australia
>
>
>
>
> John Campbell wrote:
>
> > But Jason, there is (free) anti-virus software for 10.4.  For example
> >
> > <http://www.sophos.com/en-us/products/free-tools/sophos-antivirus-
> > for-mac-home-edition/system-requirements.aspx>
> >
> > OS 10.8 will require a new machine, which is fair enough if you have
> > the financial capacity.  But why not keep an older system running for
> > as long as possible?  I quite understand the comment Vicki made that
> > "Seems if you don't keep up with upgrades, even if your computer is
> > working perfectly, some functions will be withdrawn by the forces 'out
> > there'".  I've been thinking about upgrading from 10.4 too, but have
> > to admit that this is in part due to forces 'in here'.  In other
> > words, in capitalist societies consumerism is equated with virtue.
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU