naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Creating delrin mic supports for SASS

Subject: Re: Creating delrin mic supports for SASS
From: "Rob Danielson" danielson_audio
Date: Fri Sep 24, 2010 11:00 pm ((PDT))
At 1:42 AM +0000 9/25/10, thesilverloon wrote:
>  Rob, thanks for that info.
>There's now no good reason not to build one.
>Maybe except for one. Wind protection. How well can they be baffled
>against the wind?
>The original windsock supplied by Crown, would not appear to be that
>effective.

The stretchy material cover works pretty good until the wind gets
into 15+ mph range.  Vicki Pows adds a wooly layer to the stretchy
material she can comment about. A single layer of burlap in a full
surround of dead air is working pretty well for me up to about 25-30
mph. I couldn't get fake fur to work in proximity to the SASS body
without too much HF loss. Rob D.

  =3D =3D =3D


>I would be mounting my AT 4022'S into this setup if I were to build one.
>
>Paul
>--- In
><naturerecordists%40yahoogroups.com>=
m,
>Rob Danielson <> wrote:
>>
>>  Hi Paul--
>>  Can one make a baffle using high-density foam that will provide
>>  comparable or indistinguishable performance? Its definitely doable.
>>  There are several types of high-density, _open cell_ foam out there.
>>  I tested four or five kinds and found they did pass pink noise with
>>  very slight differences. A neat aspect of foam baffle is it cleanly
>>  passes some sound energy under < 1100Hz to the off-side mic. These
>>  frequencies are critical for time arrival differences. Michael
>>  Billingsley doesn't mention this aspect of the baffle in his SASS
>>  patent as far as I can tell. Would different types of foam make
>>  audible differences? All we need to do is make some up and compare
>>  them to find out.
>>
>>  Cutting and sanding the foam to fit snuggly into the crown housing
>>  would take some time. Vicki Powys discovered that sanding is a good
>>  way to get the final shape and dimensions.
>>
>>  Any open cell foam that has a density of 1.5 to 1.8 pounds per cubic
>>  foot and is at least 4 inches thick should perform to Billingsley's
>>  high frequency absorption specifications. I use "charcoal gray"
>>  acoustic foam. A 10" X 10" X 4" piece should be sufficient to make
>>  a SASS baffle replacement. Measure twice, cut once. Rob D.
>>
>>  =3D =3D =3D =3D
>>
>>  At 11:27 PM +0000 9/24/10, thesilverloon wrote:
>>  >Does anyone know how important using the correct foam for the
>>nose piece is?
>>  >One can buy just the foam nose piece from Crown as a spare part, and
>>  >then build the rest.
>>  >Thats still $100 landed in Australia. But if any closed cell foam
>>  >would work,that would make the project that more do-able.
>>  >
>>  >Regards,
>>  >
>>  >Paul
>>
>>
>>  --
>>
>
>


--









<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU