naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: mbho MBP 648 PZ

Subject: Re: mbho MBP 648 PZ
From: "Scott Fraser" scottbfraser
Date: Thu Jul 15, 2010 7:53 am ((PDT))
<< i would expect a six db improvement in self noise when a capsule is  
used in the boundary layer.

<Wouldn't the self-noise percentage in the mic's signal be raised
along with the increased output from the boundary effect?>

<no. the gain is noisefree. and first time you hear it, very  
impressive. (i have
built many varients on the boundary layer principle.)
umashankar>>

Note that the 'gain' is actually an increase in the acoustic volume at  
the surface of the boundary, hence the name Pressure Zone Microphone  
of the original commercial implementation of this principal. So the  
microphone simply has a louder acoustic signal presented when the  
diaphragm is in the pressure zone. Thus less preamp gain is required,  
& less gain means lower noise in the resulting recording, even though  
the self noise of the system stays the same. I seem to recall that the  
pressure zone is about a quarter inch deep in the audible band.

Scott Fraser








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU