hi daniel,
strange site, could be new, but you never know, some things they offer
are not even mentioned on the site as i heard.
i phoned them today, and they are very friendly. the would send me
some mics for testing if i want to.
lets see, i have enough to do and test the next time (the tascam is
here with some 4022..):-), but this seems to be very interesting..
emil
Am 13.07.2010 um 15:56 schrieb Rob Danielson:
> At 8:58 AM +0200 7/13/10, emil klotzsch wrote:
> >hi,
> >anybody ever tried those mics?:
> ><http://www.mbho.de/pdf/mbp648pz_mbnm620pz.pdf>http://www.mbho.de/pdf/mb=
p648pz_mbnm620pz.pdf
> >
> >they seem to have a self noise of 7db(A)?
> >i think i have missread it, right?
> >
> >any other thoughts about mbho?
> >
> >all the best
> >evs
> >
> Hi Emil--
> Good find! I was looking over the MBHO mic offerings a few months
> back. Could it be new?
>
> The specs suggest 7db(A) self-noise to me. The sensitivity is on the
> low side but workable (14 mV/Pa). With the head separated from the
> xlr barrel, one might be able to mount it in a number of ways. As-is,
> mounted perpendicular to a small boundary, its very similar to
> Crown's PCC or Phase Coherent Cardioid Mic http://tinyurl.com/24xywsv
> The PCC is the closest cousin I know of to Curt's wooden boundary
> mics-- the most common version being the Parallel Boundary with omni
> mics. The tone of cardioid mics on a boundary is usually a little
> warmer and the polar pattern is a little more front directional as
> you would expect.
>
> MBHO makes quality mics. I can imagine trying the capsules in a some
> boundary arrays that might work better for spatial imaging than the
> small perp2 plates, so I'm wondering if the mic be separated from the
> plate and if MBHO would give someone one to test. Rob D.
>
> --
>
>
>
>
|