I agree, this is difficult! Rob's demo has one clip with more low
frequencies than the other, while Paul's demo has one clip (free)
with more high frequencies than the other. So I am "baffled" :-)
Vicki
On 16/07/2010, at 4:01 PM, hartogj wrote:
> That is a tough one, Rob. There is definitely a shift in qualities
> between the two, but one does not seem to have 6dB less noise than
> the other. That may be because the subject clock and crow are on
> axis to the mic capsule in both, where I would expect the biggest
> difference would be for sounds the boundary itself is facing. I'm
> going to guess that A is on the boundary, because it sounds like
> the barrier shadows some of the higher frequency content heard in
> B. Even with 50% chance to get it right, I bet I am wrong.
>
> John Hartog
>
>
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/28aqxkw
>>
>> Which is the boundary mic arrangement and which is open air? Is
>> there a significant difference in self-noise performance? Is there
>> "awful comb filtering" in one sample that is not in the other?
>>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie
> Krause
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
|