Hi Rob,
On 06/03/2010, at 2:10 AM, Rob Danielson wrote:
>
> Hi Pauls--
> I was attracted to the smaller size of the professional-looking
> Denecke P2 when I was testing phantom units a few years back but I
> got a hum and additional noise when I used P2's with Sharp (MD) and
> Sony (MD & Hi-MD) 3.5mm/PIP mic inputs. Performance could differ from
> unit to unit, Denecki could have made some production changes since
> then and PIP circuits certainly differ. Paul Jacobson or someone else
> might be able to confirm P2/M10 compatibility.
I'll defer to your testing on the Denecke - it's a pity as the smaller case=
size would be useful. I've only used a diy phantom supply based on the Ro=
lls schematic and this worked quite well with a Sony Hi-MD.
> I think you're right. I let David's continuing enthusiasm about his
> 4022's cloud my objectivity. I listened to his comparison of a MKH-40
> to a AT-4022 again and I agree that the verdict is till out:
> http://bioacoustics.cse.unsw.edu.au/archives/html/naturerecordists/2009-1=
1/msg00313.html
> I see that the lower pricing on the 4022's we saw back in November is
> no longer available. Rob D.
A quick google revealed the best listed price for the AT-4022 of $249US at =
Musicians Friend, but no stock until mid month. Several sources including =
BHPhotovideo have them in stock at $280US. It's still away to go before we =
see them at the old AT3032 prices.
cheers
Paul
|