naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Question On Sony PCM-M10 And Mic Combination

Subject: Re: Question On Sony PCM-M10 And Mic Combination
From: "Robin" escalation746
Date: Sun Mar 7, 2010 4:13 pm ((PST))
justinasia wrote:

> 1) Just your PCM-M10, which is a great product and has nice quiet mics 
> already, relative to what it is. This for super portability. Then
> 2) Fostex FR2le with those nice AT mics. Relatively good battery life, 
> lightweight for the quality, and all in one unit. This for the really good 
> recording.
> 
> I would think this would save you a lot of hassle, time to set up, tangles, 
> awkwardness and so on, and should also be better sound-wise.

Exactly what I would do. In fact it's what I do do. I am not a fan of 
harnessing external pres to cheap recorders as this adds too many points of 
failure, doesn't save money and doesn't result in any improved sound quality 
over taking a better recorder in the first place.

A portable recorder means never having to miss a recording. I generally carry 
some cheap Panasonic cap mics to use with PIP, since they allow stereo/binaural 
recordings with much better sound stage. In my short experience the omnis in 
the M10 have a rather flat / thin stage. Though they are noisier, I actually 
prefer the built-in mics on the Panasonic LS-10.

For critical recordings I use the Fostex with 2x AT3032, though this requires a 
mic stand, stereo bar and (at some point in my future) a baffle. Hardly 
something you'd take out on a hunch.

-- robin







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU