Subject: | Re: tape digitizing |
---|---|
From: | "Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999 |
Date: | Sun Sep 27, 2009 10:20 am ((PDT)) |
John, you wrote, > In my opinion, hard drives are the best. Seems to me a properly-stored CD-R might be accessible longer than a hard drive. The hard drive interface is likely to be obsolete sooner, and the unused mechanism likely to get sticky. > Google the longevity of a CD-R and you'll hear the manufacturers > talk about 30-100 years. That won't happen. Tech circles talk in > terms of 5-10. Can you point me to a source for that information? What's the failure mode? The "mark" on a CD-R is the dye layer having been overheated to a sort of foam that scatters light, right? I'm thinking it won't read if 1) the transparency of the plastic is lost, 2) the reflective layer isn't reflective any more, or 3) the dye layer decays so the mark-space transmissivity contrast degrades. -Dan Dugan |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: tape digitizing, John |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: tape digitizing, John |
Previous by Thread: | Re: tape digitizing, John |
Next by Thread: | Re: tape digitizing, John |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU