naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: tape digitizing

Subject: Re: tape digitizing
From: "marcelo" marcheloara
Date: Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:21 am ((PDT))
Thanks John,

Yes, they are all cassettes. We do have digital recorders, a Marantz PMD 66=
0 and a Marantz PMD 620. However those are mostly for getting recordings in=
 the field. Digitizing 700 cassettes can easily take several months so it d=
oesn't make sense to keep them in the lab all that time. Even if we may use=
 one of those exclusively in digitizing I think that recording straight to =
a hard drive is much faster and those digital recorders can't do that. So w=
e have to buy a device. I am mostly concerned about the quality of the cass=
ette tape desk. What should be the minimum requirements in order to keep th=
e quality of the recordings? We are applying for funding to get this equipm=
ent so, what would be a good cassette tape desk?  One more question: Does t=
he quality of the cable connecting the tape desk with the computer matter?


Cheers


Marcelo Araya
Laboratorio de Bioac=FAstica
UCR




--- In  "John" <> wr=
ote:
>
> If your tapes are cassette, then you won't get nearly the quality you wil=
l get on a digital recording.  What I would do is borrow (or buy) the best =
cassette tape deck you can find and run it's "outs" into a digital recorder=
 with a good pre-amp and good anlogue to digital converter.  If you set it =
up this way, then that will record it straight to file as clean as can be d=
one.  Then you transfer that file to your computer, which is very simple vi=
a firewire or card reader.
>
> A zoom H2, for instance, will work as an external audio device anyway.  W=
hile I haven't tried this, it may even record straight to a hard drive.  My=
 Sound Devices 702 does that, but it was pricey.
>
> Almost any digital recorder will work because even 44.1 KHz sampling rate=
 will supersede the quality of your tapes, most likely.  What will preserve=
 the quality of your cassette recordings is a good analogue to digital conv=
erter.  Are you trusting that quality to a $119 device that also plays tape=
s??  That is why I recommend a good digital recorder.  It will be slightly =
more expensive, but will also serve to make future recordings for you.
>
> If you don't already have a digital recorder, then you probably need one =
and this would be a good excuse to get one ;-)
>
> That is just my opinion.
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU