Subject: | Re: 722 vs MixPre |
---|---|
From: | "Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999 |
Date: | Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:59 am ((PDT)) |
Rob Danielson wrote: > I did some blind A/B testing of the 744T's > internal pre and an MP2 when I first got my 744T > years back thinking I finally had a good way be > to compare/hear the much discussed "warmer, > fuller" transformer sound of the MP2. I tried all > the mics I had. I guessed wrong over 60% of the > time which confirmed that I have much less > discriminatory hearing than pros. Might just have meant that people often claim to hear differences that disappear when level-matched and blind. -Dan Dugan |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: 722 vs MixPre, Rob Danielson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 1. Help on uninterrupted recording for research monitoring, Po-Jen Chiang |
Previous by Thread: | Re: 722 vs MixPre, Rob Danielson |
Next by Thread: | Re: 722 vs MixPre, David Michael |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU