Subject: | Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings |
---|---|
From: | "Lou Judson" inaudio |
Date: | Sun May 20, 2007 7:54 am ((PDT)) |
Did you use proper dithering when you made the master for CD? Simply converting 24 to 16 without dither will sound poor. And what kind of dither used is another subject! <L> On May 19, 2007, at 12:54 PM, Paul Delcour wrote: > I once recorded by accident on my Edirol R4 in 24/96 mode. When I > downgraded to 16/44.1 I definitely could hear the loss in quality, in > detail mostly and lack of airyness, ie ambient space. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Backpacking Solutions Revisited, geopaul7 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings, Walter Knapp |
Previous by Thread: | Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings, Rob Danielson |
Next by Thread: | Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings, Walter Knapp |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU