| Subject: | Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings |
|---|---|
| From: | "Marty Michener" enjoybirds |
| Date: | Sun May 20, 2007 9:30 am ((PDT)) |
At 10:52 AM 5/20/2007, you wrote: >Did you use proper dithering when you made the master for CD? Simply >converting 24 to 16 without dither will sound poor. And what kind of >dither used is another subject! > ><L> Lou: I've been in a proper dither ever since I started going deaf! -- best regards, Marty Michener MIST Software Assoc. Inc., P. O. Box 269, Hollis, NH 03049 http://www.enjoybirds.com/ "What we need is a list of biologists, broken down by specialization." - AIBS Style Handbook |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings, Tim Nielsen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings, Scott Fraser |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings, Tim Nielsen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings, Scott Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU