Subject: | Re: Sound Devices 442 Mixer |
---|---|
From: | "Lou Judson" inaudio |
Date: | Sun Mar 25, 2007 10:44 am ((PDT)) |
Sorry for piping in late with the same suggestion - but, Rob, why use the analog instead of digital connection between the two decks? It would keep one analog circuit out of it, even if they are extremely clean analog circuits! <L> On Mar 25, 2007, at 12:35 AM, Rob Danielson wrote: > Two very short, mini-xlr cables made with thin lavaliere > cabling between the 722 to the 744 is hardly noticeable. I've used > the school's 722 for this purpose; the balanced line to balance line > connections/circuits are very clean. Rob D. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Sound Devices 442 Mixer, Lou Judson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Prairie Chickens, Rich Peet |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Sound Devices 442 Mixer, Lou Judson |
Next by Thread: | Re: Sound Devices 442 Mixer, Rob Danielson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU