Rob's preamp tests are indeed still on our server, the link is at the
bottom
of this page:
http://www.micbooster.com/products/fel3.5series.html
I should make it clear that there are 2 types of FEL preamp.
Firstly there is the MicBooster range (which Mik Gough was enquiring
about), operated from 48 Volt phantom power with balanced input and
output. Secondly there is the 3.5 Series (as tested by Rob) which
operate from plug in power and have an unblanced output for use with
"domestic" recorders. Full details are our website.
I hope this has cleared any confusion,
Nick Roast.
FEL Communications.
http://www.micbooster.com/
--- In Rob Danielson <> wrote:
>
>
> >
> >>
> >> Seems like the SQN IVe's s-n would still be the
> >> limiting factor, you'd just be gambling that the
> >> SQN IVe has proportionally less noise at a lower
> >> gain setting. Rob D.
> >
> >I think you are correct in this, I've decided to hold off with the FEL
> >until I have the new recorder, I will record direct, avoiding the SQN.
> >(At least whilst sounscape recording).
> >
>
> The FEL does seem to help dynamic mics going into a HiMD pre or
> similar recorder for quieter locations because of their low output.
> I should have tested this more thoroughly but the ones I had were too
> noisy. For people with lower output condenser mics, the test movie
> may be on Nick's server. Rob D
>
>
> --
> Rob Danielson
> Film Department
> University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|