Subject: | Re: FEL mic pre |
---|---|
From: | "Mik Gough" <> |
Date: | Thu, 24 Nov 2005 22:58:17 -0000 |
--- In Rob Danielson <> wrote: > >. The mkh's > are pretty sensitive. What recorder? What recorder? I am between recorders at the moment having just sold my HHB portadat. (Because DAT is fading quickly). Sound Devices recorders are on the wish list. > > Seems like the SQN IVe's s-n would still be the > limiting factor, you'd just be gambling that the > SQN IVe has proportionally less noise at a lower > gain setting. Rob D. I think you are correct in this, I've decided to hold off with the FEL until I have the new recorder, I will record direct, avoiding the SQN. (At least whilst sounscape recording). ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: low voltage DC phantom (was new fi rmware for M-Audio Microtra=, Klas Strandberg |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: low voltage DC phantom (was new firmware for M-Audio Microtrac=, Rob Danielson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: FEL mic pre, Rob Danielson |
Next by Thread: | Re: FEL mic pre, Rob Danielson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU