| Subject: | Re: low voltage DC phantom (was new firmware for M-Audio Microtrac= |
|---|---|
| From: | Rob Danielson <> |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Nov 2005 19:26:00 -0600 |
k 2496 At 7:26 PM +0100 11/24/05, wrote: <snip> > >Klas, this is the reason why I would not over-estimate the bad results you >got in your test on the MT2496 phantom power. At least the phantom power o= f >my own MT2496 is sufficiently clean for operating my phantom-powered (and >balanced) K6P/ME66 microphone. > >Raimund I can loan someone an Art Phantom II unit to test the extent of the MT's internal phantom circuit on mic input noise if they have an MicroTrack 24/96 and low-noise, phantom powered mics. The Art and Rolls units tested a couple of times as indistinguishable from the 722's internal phantom using NT1-A's. Contact me off list. Rob D. ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: FEL mic pre, Mik Gough |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: DIY 5X9v bat phantom supply (was low voltage DC phantom, Rob Danielson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: low voltage DC phantom (was new firmware for M-Audio Microtrac=, recordingbird |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Powering Small Electrets was low voltage DC phantom, Mark R. |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU