naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: DIY 5X9v bat phantom supply (was low voltage DC phantom

Subject: Re: DIY 5X9v bat phantom supply (was low voltage DC phantom
From: Rob Danielson <>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 19:45:07 -0600
I bought the parts to build a 5X9 volt battery
phantom unit right before I took a chance on
buying a Rolls that proved to work (for quiet
location nature recording). If anyone wants to
take a look at the schematic that Klas was
helping me with and add variations/improvements,
I'll try to pull the collective insights together
and build up one up and test it.  I was aiming
for PIP 1/8" HIMD unbalanced mic inputs.  This is
a pretty specialized discussion. I'm happy to
move it off list. Rob D.

At 7:12 AM -0800 11/24/05, umashankar wrote:
>i keep forgetting to post this. one of the simplest
>ways to build a phantom power is to wire a number of
>nine volt batteries together 5 of them will do. it is
>larger than doing it with two nine volt batteries, but
>it is a great deal more efficient so you actually save
>money buying batteries, and it is probably the
>quietest thing you can do. two 1 per cent metal film
>resistors of about 6.8 k, to 100 mfd 50 volt
>capacitors and two 1 mfd film capacitors in parallel
>is all it takes.
>
>umashankar
>
>--- Klas Strandberg <> wrote:
>
>>  Just add: I have been working with electronics since
>>  1982. I have learned
>>  that it is really difficult to weight together
>>  different peoples
>>  experiences of some device.
>>  This is not only a problem caused by everyone's
>>  subjectivity, but also a
>>  technical. Just remember that standard components,
>>  capacitors and
>>  resistors, might have a +/- 20% tolerance. Suppose a
>>  condensor (whatever)
>>  of one power supply is -20 % and another +20%? Will
>>  they both work at -20
>>  centigrade??
>>
>>  We naturesound people run constantly into problems
>>  which no one else
>>  bothers much about. We often work "on the limit" of
>>  what a product is meant
>>  for.
>>
>>  Klas.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  At 12:22 2005-11-24, you wrote:
>>  >Yes, you are right in a way - Sennheiser made their
>>  own power supplies etc.
>>  >To make a good power supply is difficult.
>>  >But with new IC's, it is easy to make a lot of
>>  shortcuts. Then you can also
>>  >make a cheap power supply, with uncertain
>>  reliability.
>>  >However, my old Tascam DA-P1 has such a simplified
>>  power supply and it has
>>  >never caused any problems...?
>>  >
>>  >Klas.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >At 04:47 2005-11-23, you wrote:
>>  > > >According to my friend it is more or less by
>>  chance all the time if a
>>  > power
>>  > >
>>  > > >device works or not. He says that all modern
>>  IC-circuit for the purpose
>>  > > >have a tendency to drift away in frequency. In
>>  his experience only one of
>>  > > >them work under all circumstances, stable and
>>  pure. In his opinion, the
>>  > > >Rolls is a very conventional and thereby
>>  unreliable device. ... if it
>>  > > >works, it works... kind of.
>>  > >
>>  > > >Klas.
>>  > >
>>  > > >Does the phantom power supply he's designed
>>  produce less noise? Are
>>  > > >you free to tell us more? Is it portable? What
>>  operating voltage?
>>  > >
>>  > > >Rob D.
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >Hi Klas,
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >Isn't what you are getting at is that the Rolls
>>  might accidentally coincide
>>  > >with the correct powering voltages on some
>>  microphones?
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >That to be certain that you are providing the
>>  correct voltages the
>>  > >manufacturer would be wise to supply the mic with
>>  the correct phantom power
>>  > >unit, just as Neumann has always done?
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >By saying if the Rolls works, it works by chance?
>>  and should not be
>>  > >considered unless there is evidence providing
>>  it's powering that microphone
>>  > >model accurately?
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >Best,
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >Mark
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >[Non-text portions of this message have been
>>  removed]
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >"Microphones are not ears,
>>  > >Loudspeakers are not birds,
>>  > >A listening room is not nature."
>>  > >Klas Strandberg
>>  > >Yahoo! Groups Links
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  >
>>  >Telinga Microphones, Botarbo,
>>  >S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden.
>>  >Phone & fax int + 295 310 01
>  > >email: 
>>  >         
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >"Microphones are not ears,
>>  >Loudspeakers are not birds,
>>  >A listening room is not nature."
>>  >Klas Strandberg
>>  >Yahoo! Groups Links
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>
>>  Telinga Microphones, Botarbo,
>>  S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden.
>>  Phone & fax int + 295 310 01
>>  email: 
>>          =A0
>>
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>>
>>
>>  "Microphones are not ears,
>>  Loudspeakers are not birds,
>>  A listening room is not nature."
>>  Klas Strandberg
>>  Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>      
>>
>>=A0
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>__________________________________
>Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
>http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>"Microphones are not ears,
>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>A listening room is not nature."
>Klas Strandberg
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


--
Rob Danielson
Film Department
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU