Subject: | Re: for all you high end surround heads out there |
---|---|
From: | "Rich Peet" <> |
Date: | Wed, 16 Jun 2004 22:00:11 -0000 |
So why did my technique get disregarded? I assure you it is real surround. It also would make more sense to use my favorite technique for research species sampling then the "real" Lang approach. Rich --- In Walter Knapp <> wrote: > From: Curt Olson <> > > > > But what Lang is trying to describe to us here is making perfect sense > > to me. This is the first time ever that I have not dismissed the notion > > of "surround sound" with a disrespectful sniff. > > To me the criteria Lang set up are the only "surround sound", the other > is just more elaborate stereo. > > Walt > ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
Previous by Date: | Re: Digest Number 1401 or Trimming Posts, Walter Knapp |
---|---|
Next by Date: | ...surround high end heads, Wild Sanctuary |
Previous by Thread: | Re: for all you high end surround heads out there, Walter Knapp |
Next by Thread: | Re: for all you high end surround heads out there, rudytrubitt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU